AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 58(1), 1998, pp. 22-25
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rojnuckarin, P
Right arrow Articles by Swasdikul, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rojnuckarin, P
Right arrow Articles by Swasdikul, D
Related Collections
Right arrow Snake Bite
Right arrow Venomous creatures
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol 58, Issue 1, 22-25
Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Research Articles


Prognostic factors of green pit viper bites

P Rojnuckarin, S Mahasandana, T Intragumthornchai, P Sutcharitchan, and D Swasdikul

Clinical features of green pit viper bites vary from asymptomatic to fatal bleeding. Antivenin promptly reverses the coagulopathy but has considerable adverse side effects. In this study, potential clinical predictors of severe outcomes (wound necrosis, wound infection, and systemic bleeding) and antivenin allergy were determined in 271 moderate to severe cases of green pit viper bites by multivariate analysis. The incidences of systemic bleeding, wound necrosis, secondary infection, and antivenin allergy were 17.3%, 6.6%, 5.5%, and 20.8% respectively. The predictors of systemic bleeding were the combination of thrombocytopenia and prolonged venous clotting time and bite sites away from digits. A bite on the fingers or toes was a risk factor for skin necrosis (P = 0.03). Systemic absorption of the venom from digits may be poor, resulting in severe local but mild systemic effects. The presence of blisters often led to necrosis and secondary infections (P = 0.0037 and P = 0.0006, respectively). Although negative skin test results do not exclude the possibility of antivenin allergy, positive results indicate a high risk (P = 0.016) requiring special precautions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.