AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 57(6), 1997, pp. 706-708
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, A.
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebrahim, A.
Right arrow Articles by Barakat, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DIETHYL ETHER
*FORMALDEHYDE

Evaluation of the Kato-Katz Thick Smear and Formal Ether Sedimentation Techniques for Quantitative Diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni Infection

A. Ebrahim, H. El-Morshedy, E. Omer, S. El-Daly AND R. Barakat
Department of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

The present study compared the Kato-Katz thick smear and formol ether sedimentation techniques in the diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni infections. A stool specimen was collected from 915 individuals representing a high prevalence community (63.3%) and from 471 individuals representing a relatively low prevalence village (40%). The overall sensitivity of a single Kato-Katz smear was 70.8%, and it increased with each additional slide to reach 91.7% on examining four smears. However, the sensitivity was 83.3% when using the formol ether sedimentation technique. In terms of quantitative analysis, the geometric mean egg count was 94 eggs per gram (epg) of stool by two Kato-Katz smears, and 43 epg by the sedimentation technique. This means that more than 50% of eggs were missed when using the sedimentation technique, a fact that should be taken into consideration when relating infection level with morbidity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
D. GOODMAN, H. J. HAJI, Q. D. BICKLE, R. J. STOLTZFUS, J. M. TIELSCH, M. RAMSAN, L. SAVIOLI, and M. ALBONICO
A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETECTING THE EGGS OF ASCARIS, TRICHURIS, AND HOOKWORM IN INFANT STOOL, AND THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF INFECTION IN ZANZIBARI INFANTS
Am J Trop Med Hyg, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 725 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.