AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 56(4), 1997, pp. 474-481
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Piessens, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Piessens, W. F.

Evaluation of Recombinant Chitinase and SXP1 Antigens as Antimicrofilarial Vaccines

Shi Hai Wang, Hui Jun Zheng, Sen Dissanayake, Wen Fang Cheng, Zheng Hou Tao, Shun Zhi Lin AND Willy F. Piessens
Department of Tropical Public Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Guizhou Provincial Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Guiyang, Guizhou, People's Republic of China

Prior studies indicate that a microfilarial stage-specific chitinase is a possible candidate antigen for a transmission-blocking vaccine against Brugian filariasis. The antigen is a functional enzyme that progressively appears as microfilariae mature and become able to infect and develop in a susceptible mosquito vector. It is recognized by a monoclonal antibody that reduces microfilaremia in infected animals and by a subset of sera from infected persons who remain amicrofilaremic. Immunization of jirds with recombinant chitinase induced partial protection against microfilaremia resulting from subsequent infection with Brugia malayi, but did not reduce adult worm burdens. Vaccination was much less effective when administered during the prepatent stage of infection and was ineffective when given to microfilaremic jirds. The protective epitope appears to be located close to the carboxy terminus of the chitinase molecule. Immunization of jirds with SXP1, an antigen present in multiple worm stages, also reduced microfilaremia and, in some experiments, adult worm burdens, but hyperimmunization with a recombinant filarial myosin was not protective. These observations indicate that the relative timing of immunization and infection is an important factor in the efficacy of antimicrofilarial vaccines.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
R. T. Fujiwara, B. Zhan, S. Mendez, A. Loukas, L. L. Bueno, Y. Wang, J. Plieskatt, Y. Oksov, S. Lustigman, M. E. Bottazzi, et al.
Reduction of Worm Fecundity and Canine Host Blood Loss Mediates Protection against Hookworm Infection Elicited by Vaccination with Recombinant Ac-16
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., March 1, 2007; 14(3): 281 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.