AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 53(5), 1995, pp. 526-531
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benito, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alvar, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benito, A.
Right arrow Articles by Alvar, J.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to Chloroquine, Amodiaquine, Quinine, Mefloquine, and Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine in Equatorial Guinea

A. Benito, J. Roche, R. Molina, C. Amela AND J. Alvar
Department of Parasitology, National Center of Microbiology, and National Center of Epidemiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain; Hispano-Guinean Center of Tropical Diseases, Spanish Agency of International Cooperation, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea

Between March 1990 and June 1992, a study was carried out in Equatorial Guinea on the in vitro response of Plasmodium falciparum to different antimalarial drugs. Field work for the study was conducted both in the country's island region as well as on the mainland, and resistant isolates were found to exhibit interregional differences. On the island of Bioko, 204 tests were performed with 16% (11 of 69) resistant to chloroquine, 9% (4 of 46) resistant to quinine, 14% (6 of 43) resistant to a combination of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, and 6.5% (3 of 46) resistant to amodiaquine. In the mainland area of Bata, the same antimalarial drugs and mefloquine were tested with the following results: 9% (5 of 58) resistant to chloroquine; 2% (1 of 58) resistant to amodiaquine, and 3% (2 of 58) resistant to a combination of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. No isolates resistant to quinine or mefloquine were found. Effective concentrations (EC50, EC90, and EC99) and regression lines (log dose/response) for each antimalarial drug were calculated to establish a surveillance system for antimalarial drug chemosensitivity in Equatorial Guinea. Finally, 12 isolates from 12 patients previously treated with chloroquine were studied to compare both tests (in vivo-in vitro) and obtain a correlation between the RII and RIII types of in vivo and in vitro resistances. No correlation for the RI type was found between the two methods.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. T. Mariga, J. P. Gil, C. Sisowath, W. H. Wernsdorfer, and A. Bjorkman
Synergism between Amodiaquine and Its Major Metabolite, Desethylamodiaquine, against Plasmodium falciparum In Vitro
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2004; 48(11): 4089 - 4096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.