AJTMH Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 53(1), 1995, pp. 36-39
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiatt, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiatt, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, E.

How Many Stool Examinations are Necessary to Detect Pathogenic Intestinal Protozoa?

Robert A. Hiatt, Edward K. Markell AND Ernest Ng
Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Oakland, California; Division of Research and Regional Laboratory, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland and Berkeley, California

Recent reports have suggested that examination of one stool specimen is sufficient to detect protozoa in symptomatic patients. To verify this hypothesis, we examined specimens submitted to the regional laboratory of a large, prepaid health plan that provides primary care to a membership representative of the general population in northern California. We examined the number and results of stool specimen examinations in the two-month period before detection of Entamoeba histolytica in 125 infected persons, of Giardia lamblia in 154 infected persons, and of Dientamoeba fragilis in 60 persons infected with this parasite. About 13% of the entire group had a single stool specimen examined, 19% had two examined, 65% had three examined, and 6% had more than three examined. Most infections were detected in the first specimen or specimens submitted, but many were not detected until later examination. Thirteen patients with E. histolytica (10.4%) required 4–9 examinations. The sensitivity of one examination was compared with that of three examinations; with the additional examinations, the yield increased 22.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.8–33.5%) for E. histolytica, 11.3% (95% CI = 6.9–81.8%) for G. lamblia, and 31.1% (95% CI = 17.7–54.4%) for D. fragilis. Our results suggest that a single stool specimen examination will miss many pathogenic protozoan infections in symptomatic persons.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
S. A. Pai
Amebic Colitis Can Mimic Tuberculosis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Endoscopy and Biopsy
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, April 1, 2009; 17(2): 116 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. D. Libman, T. W. Gyorkos, E. Kokoskin, and J. D. MacLean
Detection of Pathogenic Protozoa in the Diagnostic Laboratory: Result Reproducibility, Specimen Pooling, and Competency Assessment
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2008; 46(7): 2200 - 2205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Trop Med HygHome page
D. STARK, R. FOTEDAR, S. VAN HAL, N. BEEBE, D. MARRIOTT, J. T. ELLIS, and J. HARKNESS
PREVALENCE OF ENTERIC PROTOZOA IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV)-POSITIVE AND HIV-NEGATIVE MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN FROM SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
Am J Trop Med Hyg, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 549 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.