AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 53(1), 1995, pp. 16-22
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akuffo, H.
Right arrow Articles by Berhan, T. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akuffo, H.
Right arrow Articles by Berhan, T. Y.

In Vivo Evaluation of Immune Responses in Leishmaniasis: The Use of Cross-Species Leishmanin Preparations for Skin Testing

Hannah Akuffo, Martha Darce, Kerima Maasho AND Tebebe Yamane Berhan
Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden; Centro Nacional de Higiene y Epidemiologia (CNHE), Managua, Nicaragua; All Africa Leprosy Rehabilitation and Training Center (ALERT), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Skin test reactivity to two commercial preparations of Leishmania major leishmanin was evaluated in leishmaniasis patents from Ethiopia (L. aethiopica) and Nicaragua (probably L. braziliensis complex). The purpose of using different preparations of L. major was to evaluate whether L. major skin test antigens could generally be used to detect leishmaniasis due to L. aethiopica and L. braziliensis. One preparation was superior in identifying the majority (83–90%) of confirmed cases of local cutaneous leishmaniasis (LCL) from Ethiopia. In vitro responses to promastigotes of Leishmania spp. correlated well with leishmanin positivity to this preparation. The skin test antigen, which performed less well (showing a positive result in only 50% of the LCL patents), showed promise when used to test active and cured cases of leishmaniasis in Nicaragua (positive result in 92% of the active and cured patents). Cross-reacting Leishmania spp. may be considered for use in the preparation of standardized leishmanin antigen; however, differences in the commercial preparation or the diluent in which the parasites are prepared may affect antigenicity and thus its efficacy in detecting different forms of leishmaniasis in different geographic areas.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.