AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 5(3), 1956, pp. 497-500
Copyright © 1956 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mintz, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Most, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mintz, D. T.
Right arrow Articles by Most, H.

RO 2-1160, a New Drug for the Treatment of Amebiasis

David T. Mintz, Jay W. Miller, Paolo Ottolenghi, Jerome Schack Frederick Van Assendelft AND Harry Most
Department of Preventive Medicine, N. Y. U.—Bellevue Medical Center and the Tropical, Disease Diagnostic Clinic (Lower East Side Health Center), New York City Health Department, New York

Ro 2-1160,1 a new pentavalent aromatic stibonic acid (2-carboxymethyl-mercapto-benzine stibonic acid) has been found to be significantly active in curing experimentally induced E. histolytica infections in the rat, well tolerated by dogs, and relatively non-toxic in small animals (Schnitzer, 1954; Schnitzer et al., 1951). The present report deals with the results of trials with this agent in human colonic amebiasis.

Materials and Methods. The patients were treated and studied at the Tropical Disease Diagnostic Clinic (Lower East Side Health Center, New York City Health Department). The diagnosis of amebiasis was established by the demonstration of cysts and/or trophozoites of E. histolytica in casually passed or post-cathartic fecal specimens (direct smear and zinc sulphate centrifugal flotation). After therapy, stool specimens were usually examined at least at tri-weekly intervals. One or more post-cathartic specimens were examined in most cases, usually one month after therapy and subsequently at 1–3 month intervals up to 12 months, in so far as practical.


1 The supplies of Ro 2-1160 used in this study were provided by Dr. R. J. Floody, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.