AJTMH Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 5(2), 1956, pp. 224-234
Copyright © 1956 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, P. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, O. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, P. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, O. W.

Histoplasmin Testing in Africa and Southern Asia

Phyllis Q. Edwards1, Anton G. Geser, Erik H. Kjølbye, Johannes Meijer2 AND Ole Worm Christensen
World Health Organization Tuberculosis Research Office, Copenhagen, Denmark and WHO/UNICEF Regional BCG Assessment Teams

Histoplasmin testing results are reported for groups of schoolchildren and village populations, totalling more than 10,000 persons, in ten different countries of Africa and Asia. All tests were given by intradermal injection of 0.1 ml. of histoplasmin dilution, the reactions were read in 48–72 hours by measuring and recording the transverse diameter of induration in millimeters, and no reactions were classified as "positive" or "negative" by the field teams. Few reactions exceeded 8 mm. in diameter for the groups tested in Libya, Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, India, Taiwan, and Burma, suggesting that histoplasmin sensitivity is probably absent in these areas. In Viet Nam and Indonesia, where a small proportion (less than 10 per cent) of the reactions tend to be concentrated around 16 mm. in diameter, specific histoplasma infection may exist although the possibility of cross-reactions with a sensitizing agent other than histoplasma must be considered. In the Sudan, where the entire country was sampled for histoplasmin sensitivity, very few reactions could be regarded as evidence of specific infection except in the southern province of Equatoria, where about 15 per cent of the reactions measured more than 10 mm. in diameter. The distributions were clearly separated into two groups interpreted as representing the infected and uninfected segments of the populations tested. Histoplasmosis, though low in prevalence, apparently exists in the central-eastern part of the African continent.


1 Present address: Tuberculosis Program, U. S. Public Health Service, Washington 25, D. C.


2 Present address: Royal Netherlands Tuberculosis Association, Riouwstraat 7, The Hague, Holland.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1956 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.