AJTMH Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 47(3), 1992, pp. 337-345
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher-Hoch, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kustner, H. G. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher-Hoch, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kustner, H. G. V.

Risk of Human Infections with Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in a South African Rural Community

S. P. Fisher-Hoch, J. B. McCormick, R. Swanepoel, A. Van Middelkoop, S. Harvey AND H. G. V. Kustner
Special Pathogens Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of National Health and Population Development, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa; National Institute for Virology, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa; Department of Microbiology, Kimberley Hospital, Kimberley, Republic of South Africa

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus is widely distributed in wild and domestic mammals, birds, and ticks throughout many regions of Africa, Europe, and Asia. Interviews were conducted with 484 individuals from nine farms in the Republic of South Africa from which recent human CCHF cases had originated and with individuals from 27 farms without recognized cases. Serum samples were obtained from all consenting individuals. Blood was also drawn from 2,212 farm animals. Human infection with CCHF virus was uncommon (point prevalence 12.6/1,000). Antibody prevalence in humans on farms increased with age (P < 0.001), and was correlated with handling lambs. Overall, a greater number of older animals were antibody positive than animals less than one year of age (P < 0.001), but 12.7% of young animals on farms with human infection were antibody positive compared with 5.8% on those farms without human infection (P < 0.05). Physical contact with ticks or tick bite was also found to be a risk factor, but contact with animal blood or fresh meat was not. The risk of CCHF virus infection in the community increased seven-fold following contact with a recognized CCHF case, even when other risk factors were taken into account (point prevalence rate 4.7%). In contrast, antibody prevalence was less than 1% (1 of 128) in the local hospital staff who had cared for patients with CCHF. Prevention is best achieved by education of the farming community and establishing and maintaining awareness in the hospital staff.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
M. MARDANI, M. RAHNAVARDI, M. RAJAEINEJAD, K. H. NAINI, S. CHINIKAR, F. POURMALEK, M. ROSTAMI, and M. H. SHAHRI
CRIMEAN-CONGO HEMORRHAGIC FEVER AMONG HEALTH CARE WORKERS IN IRAN: A SEROPREVALENCE STUDY IN TWO ENDEMIC REGIONS
Am J Trop Med Hyg, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 443 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
S. P. Fisher-Hoch
Lessons from nosocomial viral haemorrhagic fever outbreaks
Br. Med. Bull., December 22, 2005; 73-74(1): 123 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.