AJTMH Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 46(5), 1992, pp. 524-532
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hewlett, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Beaty, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hewlett, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Beaty, B. J.

Genomic and Biologic Analyses of Snowshoe Hare Virus Field and Laboratory Strains

Martinez J. Hewlett, John P. M. Clerx, Corrie M. Clerx-Van Haaster, Laura J. Chandler, Donald M. McLean AND Barry J. Beaty
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Division of Medical Microbiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Low-passage field strains of snowshoe hare (SSH) virus (Bunyaviridae), the prototype SSH virus (originally isolated in Montana), and La Crosse (LAC) virus were compared serologically by plaque-reduction neutralization (PRNT) and molecularly by oligonucleotide fingerprinting (ONF). The PRNT and ONF results confirmed the identity of the field strains, although some differences in the fingerprints were observed. We have examined the RNA genome variability in the two field and three laboratory strains of SSH virus, using direct sequence analysis of selected RNase T1 oligonucleotides. Few changes were observed among three Montana prototype-derived laboratory isolates, although they have different passage histories. In contrast, the field isolates differed greatly from the laboratory strains. In addition, we have located several of the larger T1 oligonucleotides within the known sequence of the small and large RNA genome segments. We then compared the viruses for their ability to replicate in and be transmitted by Aedes triseriatus mosquitoes. The oral infection rates for LAC, the field isolates, and the SSH prototype, as determined by immunofluorescent examination of midgut tissues, were 100%, 82%, and 47%, respectively. All viruses were also transmissible from mosquitoes to mice.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.