AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 41(6), 1989, pp. 619-626
Copyright © 1989 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cruess, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cruess, D. F.

Review of Use of Statistics in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene for January–December 1988

David F. Cruess
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland

A statistical review of all 201 scientific articles published during the calendar year 1988 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene was made to determine the type of study published by the journal, the level of statistics that was employed by the published articles, and the extent of common statistical errors. Sixty-five (32%) of the articles were classified as experimental, with most of the remaining observational studies classified as cross-sectional in design. A reader with the knowledge of only simple descriptive statistics would be able to understand 60% of the statistical procedures used in the published papers. Knowledge of the usual components of a single semester course in introductory statistics increases understanding to 91% of the techniques used. It was determined that 148 (73.5%) of the 201 articles had at least 1 detectable statistical error; most of these errors involved improper documentation or application of statistical hypothesis testing. The most common descriptive statistical error was the misuse of the concepts of "standard deviation" and "standard error" which was found in >20% of the articles. Examples of each of the common statistical errors seen are given with suggestions for improvement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
J. A. Neville, W. Lang, and A. B. Fleischer Jr
Errors in the archives of dermatology and the journal of the american academy of dermatology from january through december 2003.
Arch Dermatol, June 1, 2006; 142(6): 737 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.