AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 4(4), 1955, pp. 725-730
Copyright © 1955 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Galton, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Galton, M. M.

Salmonellosis1

THE ROLE OF FOOD PROCESSING PLANTS IN THE DISSEMINATION OF Salmonella

Albert V. Hardy AND Mildred M. Galton
Bureau of Laboratories, Florida State Board of Health and Communicable Disease Center, Public Health Service, Atlanta, Georgia

Enteric infections of man, as cholera, shigellosis, Salmonella typhi and S. paratyphi A spread only from person to person. In contrast, the sources of most Salmonella other than the above types include a variety of lower animals and birds. Attention will be limited here to a consideration of modes of spread from sources other than man.

Historically there have been wide fluctuations in the attention given to the various possible sources and modes of spread of salmonellosis. Watt (1951) has commented "Rats and mice have been traditionally considered the main culprits in the spread of salmonellosis.... Too many investigators stop studying a Salmonella case as soon as they find a mouse pellet." Recently attention has been directed to domestic fowl and particularly to the occurrence of Salmonella in powdered eggs. The problem is not to detect possible sources or modes of spread but rather to evaluate reliably their relative practical importance.


1 This work was done under the sponsorship of the Commission on Enteric Infections, Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, and was supported in part by the Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1955 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.