AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 4(3), 1955, pp. 455-459
Copyright © 1955 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Most, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Most, H.

Treatment of Schistosomiasis

Harry Most
Department of Preventive Medicine, New York University-Bellevue Medical Center, New York, N. Y.

For the past 35 years the principal and most widely used drugs in the treatment of schistosomiasis have been two antimony compounds: tartar emetic introduced by Christopherson (1918) and stibophen (Fuadin) a sulfonated catechol-antimony complex introduced by Khalil et al. (1929). Literally tons of these drugs have been used, largely empirically, in the treatment of this infection. The literature dealing with the subject is indeed voluminous, and as one reviews it, one cannot escape the recurring theme of pessimism in relation to the alleged shortcomings of these drugs, and one notes the oft repeated expression of hope for better drugs. The chemists and other laboratory investigators are repeatedly urged to provide such drugs, yet there are few examples of critical stock-taking on the part of the clinicans relative to the actual efficiency of the antimony compounds already available as therapeutic agents.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1955 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.