AJTMH Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 33(5), 1984, pp. 1026-1031
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, R. N.

Epidemiology of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever in Ohio, 1981: Serologic Evaluation of Canines and Rickettsial Isolation from Ticks Associated with Human Case Exposure Sites*

John C. Gordon{dagger}, Scott W. Gordon{ddagger}, Ellen Peterson{ddagger} AND Robert N. Philip§
{dagger} Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
{ddagger} Vector-Borne Disease Unit, Ohio Department of Health, Columbus, Ohio 43215
§ Epidemiology Branch, Rocky Mountain Laboratory, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana 59840

A survey for the prevalence of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) antibodies in dogs associated with confirmed human cases in Ohio was conducted during 1981. Twelve of 14 confirmed cases (85%) had a history of dog association prior to onset of RMSF. A total of 29 dogs were included in the study, with 16 dogs providing serum samples for antibody testing and the remainder providing tick samples. Serum samples tested by indirect microimmunofluorescence techniques revealed 12/16 dogs (75%) to be seropositive for Rickettsia rickettsii. A total of 310 ticks were collected from study dogs and the vegetation surrounding RMSF case exposure sites. Twenty-two (7.1%) of these ticks (all Dermacentor variabilis) were found to be infected with spotted fever group rickettsiae. Four ticks (1.3%) were infected with R. rickettsii, 13 (4.2%) with Rickettsia montana, and four (1.3%) with Rickettsia bellii. R. montana, a nonpathogen, was the only rickettsia found in dogs (antibodies) and ticks (isolation) associated with human cases in Southern Ohio.

Accepted for publication March 2, 1984.


* Supported by a grant from the Ohio State University Graduate School (221431).

Data included in this study were summarized in the Data Forum, Journal of Infectious Diseases, 148(6), December 1983.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
J. R CARMICHAEL and P. A FUERST
A Rickettsial Mixed Infection in a Dermacentor Variabilis Tick from Ohio
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2006; 1078(1): 334 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
C. D. PADDOCK
Rickettsia parkeri as a Paradigm for Multiple Causes of Tick-Borne Spotted Fever in the Western Hemisphere
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2005; 1063(1): 315 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. J. Demma, M. S. Traeger, W. L. Nicholson, C. D. Paddock, D. M. Blau, M. E. Eremeeva, G. A. Dasch, M. L. Levin, J. Singleton Jr., S. R. Zaki, et al.
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever from an Unexpected Tick Vector in Arizona
N. Engl. J. Med., August 11, 2005; 353(6): 587 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.