AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 33(4), 1984, pp. 739
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aaskov, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aaskov, J.

Correspondence

John Aaskov
Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 4006

In a recent article, Aleck et al. suggested that a body of previous data reported by Aaskov et al. could be attributed to "laboratory or other error." The specific issue was the observation by us that three children of the 11 born to Ross River virus-infected mothers had anti-Ross River virus IgM in their circulation at birth although the mothers did not. One of the three IgM-negative mothers had no detectable hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibody against Ross River virus at a dilution of 1:20.

In adults, IgM antibody against Ross River virus is present for about 10 weeks post onset of symptoms (range 3–35 weeks) but absent after about 19 weeks (range 7–44). We are unaware of any similar data for IgM persistence following fetal infection. Since the mothers were infected between 11 and 19 weeks post-conception it would not be surprising if some of them were IgM negative 21–29 weeks later.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.