AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 33(3), 1984, pp. 460-466
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sack, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Orskov, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sack, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Orskov, I.

Doxycycline Prophylaxis of Travelers' Diarrhea in Honduras, an Area where Resistance to Doxycycline is Common among Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli*

R. Bradley Sack{dagger}, Mathuram Santosham{dagger}, Jean L. Froehlich{dagger}, Carlos Medina{ddagger}, Frits Orskov§ AND Ida Orskov§
{dagger} Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Baltimore City Hospitals, Baltimore, Maryland 21224
The{ddagger} United States Peace Corps, Honduras, Central America
The§ WHO Collaborative Centre for Reference and Research on Escherichia, Copenhagen, Denmark

Daily doxycycline (DX), known to be effective prophylaxis against travelers' diarrhea (TD) in areas of the world where enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) are sensitive to the drug, has not been extensively studied in geographic areas where antibiotic resistance is common. Therefore we studied 44 U.S. Peace Corps Volunteers during their first 5 weeks in Honduras, which is such an area. During the first 3 weeks, volunteers took daily either 100 mg DX or placebo (PL) in a double-blind, randomized fashion. All 22 taking PL developed TD during the first 3 weeks, compared to 7 of 22 (32%) taking DX (P < 0.001; 68% protection). ETEC were isolated from 39% of episodes of TD. From the PL group, ETEC from 7 of 13 stool samples (54%) were resistant to DX, whereas from the DX group, ETEC from 10 of 11 stool samples were resistant (P < 0.05). TD that developed in persons taking DX was also found to be less severe, as judged by length of illness (P < 0.01) and frequency of stools (P < 0.05). This study demonstrates that DX 1) significantly prevents TD even in areas where antibiotic resistance is common, although it does not prevent TD caused by docycycline-resistant ETEC, and 2) significantly diminishes the severity of illness.

Accepted for publication November 27, 1983.


* Address reprint requests to: R. Bradley Sack, M.D., Sc.D., Baltimore City Hospital, Division of Geographic Medicine, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.