AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 32(3), 1983, pp. 602-609
Copyright © 1983 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendricks, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hendricks, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, W. C.

Comparison of Biological Properties of St. Louis Encephalitis and Rio Bravo Viruses

David A. Hendricks, James L. Hardy AND William C. Reeves
Department of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts 02181, and Department of Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

St. Louis encephalitis (SLE) virus, an arbovirus, and Rio Bravo (RB) virus, a non-arthropod-borne virus, are flaviviruses which cross-react in neutralization tests. Several of their biological properties were compared. Viral growth curves revealed that >99% of infectious SLE (Parton) virus remained cell-associated in Vero cells but was released slowly into the medium of infected BHK-21 cells. In contrast, RB (M-64) virus was released upon maturation into the fluids of Vero and BHK-21 cell cultures. Fortyfold more SLE virus than RB virus adsorbed to monolayer cultures of Aedes dorsalis cells. SLE but not RB virus replicated and reached high titers (108 pfu/ml) in Ae. dorsalis cell cultures maintained in media which were expected to enhance recovery of RB virus. Further, SLE but not RB virus replicated in cultured bat epithelial cells and primary duck embryo cells incubated at 42°C. Clearly, the prototype strains of RB and SLE viruses are distinct viruses. Both the classification of RB virus in the genus flavivirus and the antigenic relationship between RB and SLE viruses require further clarification.

Accepted for publication October 22, 1982.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.