AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 32(2), 1983, pp. 305-311
Copyright © 1983 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Presser, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Presser, S. B.

Comparative Vector Competence of Culex Tarsalis and Culex Quinquefasciatus from the Coachella, Imperial, and San Joaquin Valleys of California for St. Louis Encephalitis Virus*

Richard P. Meyer{dagger}, James L. Hardy AND Sally B. Presser
University of California, Department of Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Berkeley, California 94720

St. Louis encephalitis (SLE) virus has continued to be active in the Colorado Desert region of Southern California (Coachella and Imperial Valleys) since 1973, while it has virtually disappeared from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys of Central California. Consequently, comparative vector competence studies were undertaken from 1978 to 1981 to evaluate the susceptibility of populations of Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex tarsalis from the San Joaquin and Coachella/Imperial Valleys to oral infection with representative SLE viral strains from each geographical area. Culex quinquefasciatus females from both areas were equally susceptible to infection with both viral strains by the pledget and viremic chick feeding techniques. Although susceptibility profiles were similar by both feeding techniques, infection thresholds (i.e., ID50s) obtained with Cx. quinquefasciatus females were at least 10,000-fold lower when fed on viremic chicks than on virus soaked pledgets. Culex tarslis females from the two geographical areas were equally susceptible to infection with the indigenous viral strain by feeding on pledgets, and were uniformly more susceptible than sympatric populations of Cx. quinquefasciatus. Thus, differences observed in SLE viral activity in different geographical areas of California since 1973 cannot be explained by differences in the susceptibility of Cx. quinquefasciatus or Cx. tarsalis to oral infection with SLE virus.

Accepted for publication August 26, 1982.


* This study was supported in part by funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Research Grant AI03028), and by special funds for mosquito control research appropriated annually by the California Legislature.


{dagger} Arbovirus Field Station, P.O. Box 1564, Bakersfield, California 93302.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
S. MOUTAILLER, M. BOULOY, and A.-B. FAILLOUX
EFFICIENT ORAL INFECTION OF CULEX PIPIENS QUINQUEFASCIATUS BY RIFT VALLEY FEVER VIRUS USING A COTTON STICK SUPPORT
Am J Trop Med Hyg, May 1, 2007; 76(5): 827 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.