AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 32(1), 1983, pp. 185-188
Copyright © 1983 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harlan, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kline, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harlan, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kline, D. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DEET
Medline Plus Health Information
*Insect Bites and Stings

Insect Repellent Jacket Tests against Biting Midges (Diptera: Culicoides) in Panama*

H. J. Harlan{dagger}, C. E. Schreck AND D. L. Kline
Insects Affecting Man and Animals Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, Florida 32604

Light-weight net jackets treated with N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (deet) were field-tested in Panama against five species of biting midges, principally Culicoides furens (Poey) and C. barbosai Wirth and Blanton. The deet-treated jacket provided 87–93% protection. Time of day as well as season appeared to influence the proportionate numbers of species collected. The mean coefficient of protection was slightly lower during morning tests when C. barbosai was most abundant and higher during evening tests when C. furens was most abundant.

Accepted for publication May 28, 1982.


* This paper reflects the results of research only. Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors only. Mention of a chemical or a commerical or proprietary product in this paper does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of this product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or Department of Defense.

The research reported in this manuscript was conducted in part using funds provided by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command.

Address reprint requests to: C. E. Schreck, Insects Affecting Man and Animals Research Laboratory, ARS-USDA, P.O. Box 14565, Gainesville, Florida 32604.


{dagger} MAJ, MSC, U.S. Army. Present address: Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.