AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 31(3), 1982, pp. 593-598
Copyright © 1982 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Askenase, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Askenase, P. W.

Blood Eosinophil and Basophil Responses in Guinea Pigs Parasitized by Amblyomma Americanum Ticks*

Stephen J. Brown AND Philip W. Askenase
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Section of Medical Entomology, and Department of Medicine, Section of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Guinea pigs sensitized to tick feeding by a previous infestation express immune resistance when challenged. This state is associated with large accumulations of eosinophils, and especially of basophils, at cutaneous sites of tick feeding. The present study shows that primary and secondary tick feeding stimulate blood eosinophilia and basophilia that reflect the infiltration of these cells in the skin. Primary feeding of Amblyomma americanum larvae resulted in a mean tick yield of 81%, mean tick weight of 0.91 mg and a feeding period of 3–5 days. Blood eosinophils and basophils began to rise on day 2 and reached peak 3-fold increases on day 4, the time of maximum tick drop-off. Secondary feedings 26 days later resulted in a mean tick yield of 45% (52% tick rejection), mean tick weight of 0.71 mg (22% weight decrease) and a mean feeding period of 4–6 days with maximum detachment on day 5. Prior to secondary tick feeding, both eosinophil and basophil levels were greater than in tick-free animals. Eosinophil levels peaked at day 4 to a level three times greater than in primary tick hosts. Basophil levels in secondary hosts exhibited minor elevations until day 6 when they were increased significantly, reaching a peak level of 33% higher than that observed in primary feedings. This study demonstrates that blood eosinophils and basophils respond quickly and significantly to primary tick feeding and undergo secondary responses of greater magnitude in response to subsequent tick challenge. However, challenge feeding resulted in a large blood eosinophilia with a modest blood basophilia. This may reflect the balance between bone marrow production and cutaneous accumulation of these cells at sites of tick rejection. Recruitment of eosinophils and basophils from the blood to the tissue site of tick feeding may contribute to the tick resistance mechanism.

Accepted for publication September 30, 1981.


* Supported in part by grants from the United States Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Nos. AI-17555, AI-12211, AI-11077, by BRSG Grant RR-05443, and by the Rockefeller Foundation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.