AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 26(6_Part_2), 1977, pp. 76
Copyright © 1977 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Session I

Summation of Session

Neva: I wanted to make a comment upon schistosome immunity relative to the discussion this morning which focused upon events at the surface or tegument. We should remember that the schistosome is also ingesting blood constituents and spewing them forth. Perhaps some immune mechanisms might operate within the worm. This might explain reduction of egg output later in the course of infection.

Smithers: It would seem doubtful that any immune mechanism would operate against the schistosome gut until the worm has passed the lung stage. During these early stages, it would appear that the gut is not functional; certainly no red blood cells are ingested until the hepatic portal system is reached.

In the adult worm, the pH of the gut is exceedingly low—pH 2.8 I believe. In this high acidity I would doubt whether antibodies would be effective. There is evidence that Gram-negative bacteria can live happily within the gut of the adult worm although outside the worm, in the host's bloodstream, they are rapidly destroyed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.