AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 21(6), 1972, pp. 930-943
Copyright © 1972 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. K.

Hookworm in Georgia

II. Survey of Intestinal Helminth Infections in Members of Rural Households of Southeastern Georgia*

Larry K. Martin{dagger}
Department of Parasitology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Using a stratified sampling technique, a household survey was conducted in 27 counties of southeastern Georgia in which 492 households (409 white and 83 Negro) were interviewed and 749 individuals (550 white and 199 Negro) were examined for intestinal helminth infections. Hookworm was found in 16% of the whites and 8% of the Negroes, the greatest prevalence in each race being in young adults. Hookworm infections were almost twice as prevalent in males as in females of both racial groups. Most residents of rural southeastern Georgia go without shoes out-of-doors, and 46% of the whites and 16% of the Negroes reported having had ground-itch at some time, although few had experienced it within the past year. Hookworm infections were more prevalent in individuals who went barefoot and who had experienced ground-itch within the previous year, although infections were found in persons who consistently wore shoes and had never had ground-itch. As many hookworm infections were found in individuals of households which now practice sanitary disposal of wastes as in members of households which do not; however, most of these probably were acquired before the introduction of sanitary facilities. Ascaris infections were found in 1% of the white and 12% of the Negro household members, almost all of the infections being in the youngest age-groups and most from households in which not all members practiced sanitary waste disposal. No Trichuris infections were found in Negro households, and only 4 cases occurred in the white group, all apparently old infections. The prevalence of helminthiases in southeastern Georgia continues to decline, but both hookworm and Ascaris infections will continue to be transmitted in the foreseeable future. These findings probably hold true also for geographically similar areas of other southeastern states.

Accepted for publication May 30, 1972.


* Supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command under Research Grant DADA17-69G-9285, and a Research Grant from the School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine of Tulane University.


{dagger} Present address: Department of Medical Zoology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D. C. 20012.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soc Hist MedHome page
P. R. P. Coelho and R. A. McGuire
Racial Differences in Disease Susceptibilities: Intestinal Worm Infections in the Early Twentieth-Century American South
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2006; 19(3): 461 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. Schad and R. Anderson
Predisposition to hookworm infection in humans
Science, June 28, 1985; 228(4707): 1537 - 1540.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.