AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 20(1), 1971, pp. 139-145
Copyright © 1971 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, W. L.

California Group Arboviruses in Florida

Host-Vector Relations*

D. J. Taylor{dagger}, A. L. Lewis{ddagger}, J. D. Edman§ AND W. L. Jennings{ddagger}
The Epidemiology Research Center, Division of Health, Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tampa, Florida 33614, and the Entomological Research Center, Division of Health, Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Vero Beach, Florida 32960

In 1966 and 1967, from a freshwater swamp in northwest Hillsborough County, Florida, 165,354 mosquitoes were collected in CDC light traps supplemented with Dry Ice. Virus isolation was attempted from species pools of all collections. There were 128 isolations of the California group arboviruses Keystone and trivittatus: 99 from Aedes atlanticus, 28 from Aedes infirmatus, and 1 from Anopheles crucians. Keystone virus was most abundant (119 isolations) and was found most often in A. atlanticus; 8 of 9 isolations of trivittatus virus were from A. infirmatus. In both years, isolation of virus was made from the first generation of Aedes that appeared after the first heavy spring rain. The largest number of isolations was made in August, when peak densities of these mosquitoes occurred. Oviparity rates and minimum infection rates of both species appeared to be related; precipitin tests indicated that they fed mainly on wild mammals. The higher rates of feeding of A. atlanticus on rodents may be significant in view of the consistently higher infection rate in this species and the recent isolation of Keystone virus from two wild-caught cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus). Moreover, a marked increase in the infection rate with California group viruses of A. atlanticus in 1967 over 1966 corresponds with a doubled rate of feeding on rodents. No evidence of transovarian transmission of virus was found in nulliparous mosquitoes of both species.

Accepted for publication September 7, 1970.


* This investigation was supported in part by grants AI-05504 and AI-06587 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.


{dagger} Present address: Hillsborough County Arthropod Control Unit, P. O. Box 1731, Tampa, Florida 33601.


{ddagger} Present address: Epidemiology Research Center, Florida Division of Health, 4001 Tampa Bay Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33614.


§ Present address: Entomological Research Center, Florida Division of Health, P.O. Box 308, Vero Beach, Florida 32960.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.