AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 2(5), 1953, pp. 933-940
Copyright © 1953 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haines, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haines, T. W.

Breeding Media of Common Flies

I. In Urban Areas

Thomas W. Haines
Communicable Disease Center, Public Health Service, Thomasville, Georgia

A study of production sources and seasonal abundance of the more common muscoid flies from May 1950 through April 1951 showed that Musca domestica was produced by a wide range of breeding media throughout the entire period, far exceeding all other fly species in this respect. This wide adaptibility, plus the house fly's enormous reproduction potential, probably accounts for its demonstrated ability to develop insecticide-resistant populations rapidly. The occasional high production of other common species from any one of five principal fly breeding media categories was offset by its relatively infrequent occurrence or its restriction to certain items of breeding material.

Animal refuse (excrements, pen litter and wastes) not only occurred most frequently of all categories of media examined, but were also the most fly productive breeding materials occurring in the two study towns. Fruit-vegetable wastes and miscellaneous wastes were found to occur less frequently and to produce fewer flies, and were considered of secondary importance.

Species composition of flies counted indoors during the period of this study showed that 99 per cent were house flies. This species preference for human association, coupled with its abundance coincidentally with diarrheal disease in the study area, further establishes it as the major species to be considered in this area. Certain other species such as Phaenicia spp., Callitroga macellaria and Sarcophaga spp., while frequently noted in houses, actually comprised less than one per cent of flies in houses.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1953 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.