AJTMH Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 18(4), 1969, pp. 495-499
Copyright © 1969 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, O.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, O., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, J. D.

Malaria Imported to the United States from Vietnam

Chemoprophylaxis Evaluated in Returning Soldiers*

O'Neill Barrett, Jr., George Skrzypek, William Datel AND Joseph D. Goldstein{dagger}
Department of Medicine and the Research and Development Unit, Letterman General Hospital, and the Psychology Service, Fort Ord Hospital

In addition to the high incidence of malaria among the American millitary in Vietnam, there has been a progressive increase in the number of imported cases occurring in such persons following their return to the United States. Most of these cases are due to Plasmodium vivax infection. The combined chloroquine-primaquine tablet, taken once a week for 8 consecutive weeks, is effective for radical cure for vivax infection, and all returnees supposedly complete this course of therapy. This study was made to assess the effectiveness of this prophylactic program. A questionnaire survey was made of 671 Army officers and enlisted men regarding malaria prophylaxis. Of the total group, 70% failed to complete the full course of therapy. The rate of failure among officers and enlisted men was nearly equal. There was no predominant cause for failure, but common reasons given included 1) forgetting to take medication, 2) loss of pills, 3) not receiving sufficient number of pills, and 4) untoward side-effects of therapy. Persons stationed in "high-risk" malaria areas were more likely to complete therapy successfully, although previous clinical malaria did not improve the success rate in such affected persons. This extremely high failure rate of the current malaria chemoprophylaxis program would appear to be a significant factor contributing to the high incidence of imported malaria occurring in the United States.


* Please address requests for reprints to Col. Barrett, Tripler General Hospital, APO San Francisco 96438.


{dagger} U. S. Army Medical Research Unit, Presidio of San Francisco, California 94129.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. S. Kotwal, R. B. Wenzel, R. A. Sterling, W. D. Porter, N. N. Jordan, and B. P. Petruccelli
An Outbreak of Malaria in US Army Rangers Returning From Afghanistan
JAMA, January 12, 2005; 293(2): 212 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.