AJTMH Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 17(5), 1968, pp. 760-768
Copyright © 1968 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fresh, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fresh, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-T.

Leptospirosis in Man and Rodents on Taiwan*

James W. Fresh{dagger}, Che-Chung Tsai, Chuan-Huang Lai AND Che-Tong Chang
Department of Pathology, U. S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

A survey for leptospirosis in man and wild rodents in Taiwan, by serologic and cultural techniques, revealed that 3.22% of 8,362 school children were positive by the macroscopic slide-agglutination test of Galton et al.13 The number of positive reactions dropped to 1.94% when the microscopical agglutination-lysis test was employed.

A group of 65 patients with illnesses suggestive of leptospirosis were studied. Ten (15.4%) were serologically positive, and in two (3.08%) L. canicola was isolated by culture.

Of 586 rodents studied, 38 (6.48%) were positive by the macroscopic slide-agglutination test, and 20 were positive by culture. R. norvegicus were more often positive although they represented only 32% of the trapped population, and 18 of 193 (9.32%) animals were positive. Only two of 282 (representing 48.5% of the trapped population) R. rattus had positive cultures (0.71%).


* This study was supported in part by funding under Public Law 480, Section 104(c), and in part through funds provided by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, Navy Department, for Work Unit MR005.090061.

The opinions and assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Navy Department or the Naval Service at large.


{dagger} Mailing address: U. S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2, Box 14, APO San Francisco, California 96263.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.