AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 15(5), 1966, pp. 694-700
Copyright © 1966 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M.

Evaluation of A Fluorescent Antibody Test for Amebiasis Using Two Widely Differing Ameba Strains as Antigen

Morris Goldman
U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

An "indirect" fluorescent antibody test for antibodies in cases of amebiasis is described. Antigen consists of washed, intact, formalin-fixed amebae from cultures growing with mixed bacteria. Counter-staining with Evans Blue greatly improves ability to determine end-points in titrations.

Antigen from the Huff strain of Entamoeba histolytica, capable of growing at reduced as well as at body temperature, showed far fewer positive reactions than antigen prepared from a virulent, "classic" strain of this species. With the latter antigen, 73.1% of cases with confirmed intestinal amebiasis, and 91.3% of cases with confirmed or unconfirmed extra-intestinal amebiasis were found positive at 1:16 or higher. However, 5 out of 16 individuals without amebic infection were also found positive at low titer. A possible explanation for the false positives and a means for eliminating it are suggested. It is concluded that the test as here presented is technically well-fitted for the experienced laboratory to use, with caution, until more information is accumulated to explain the few anomalous results.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.