AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 14(2), 1965, pp. 309-313
Copyright © 1965 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Degiusti, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hartley, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Degiusti, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hartley, C. F.

Ectoparasites of Rats from Detroit, Michigan*

Dominic L. Degiusti{dagger} AND Charles F. Hartley
Wayne State University, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Parasitology, Detroit, Michigan

A survey of rat ectoparasites collected over a two-year period in the central city area of Detroit, Michigan, is reported. Results indicate that only live captured rats, not treated with cyanogas, give reliable indices of ectoparasite infestations. A wet combing method involving immersion in 70% isopropyl alcohol and passage through filter paper for recovery and subsequent temporary storage of the ectoparasites is described. This recovery method proved superior when compared to other (both dry and wet) methods. It proved especially efficient in recovery of minute ectoparasites such as the mite Radfordia ensifera, usually missed by conventional methods. The authors believe this method has potential for field use. The flea population of Detroit rats, when compared to surveys from comparable areas, shows a somewhat higher flea index. Xenopsylla cheopis and Nosopsyllus fasciatus are the prevalent fleas on Detroit rats; 66.2% of total fleas recovered were X. cheopis. However, 39 of the live trapped rats harbored X. cheopis and 45 harbored N. fasciatus. Eleven rats had double infections with X. cheopis and N. fasciatus. The present survey differs significantly from other surveys in the total percent infection (25.83%) with R. ensifera. Other surveys give fractional percent infection or no infection with this mite. This difference is due to the superior recovery methods described and used in the Detroit survey.


* Contribution No. 125 from the Department of Biology, Wayne State University.


{dagger} Professor of Parasitology, Department of Biology and Department of Medical Microbiology.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.