AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 12(4), 1963, pp. 686-695
Copyright © 1963 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etges, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Etges, F. J.

Experimental Studies on Chemoreception and Klinokinetic Responses of Australorbis, Bulinus, and Helisoma to Chemical Stimulation*

Frank J. Etges
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

The present investigation shows that responses of snails to chemical stimuli can be measured with sufficient precision for practical purposes. Ample space, time, and numbers of snails must be employed; otherwise increased difficulties are encountered through confusing trapping action with attraction and confusing chemoperception and immediate reaction with long-term chemo-kinetic response. The progression technique described here permits precise duplication of data and allows quantitative distinctions to be made between degrees of attraction, both of which are very difficult to obtain with any short-term method known to the writer.

Australorbis glabratus, Bulinus spp. and Helisoma anceps show small qualitative differences in their response to chemical agents, but quantitatively they may differ markedly in chemokinetic response, Bulinus was found fastest, Helisoma slowest, and Australorbis intermediate in rate of response to chemical attractants. Such differences in reaction rate are probably due to intrinsic differences in basal rates of locomotion, rather than to differences in chemosensitivity.

Present evidence indicates that substances attractive to snails are non-specific in distribution, but that they vary either in amount or in activity, or in both, in plant-seed materials. The specific identity of such attractants is unknown, but they are water soluble, heat stable, and filterable. No group of refined chemicals has yet given evidence of strong attractive action on snails.


* This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. G-6234.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. Uhazy, R. Tanaka, and A. MacInnis
Schistosoma mansoni: identification of chemicals that attract or trap its snail vector, Biomphalaria glabrata
Science, September 8, 1978; 201(4359): 924 - 926.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.