AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 11(2), 1962, pp. 220-233
Copyright © 1962 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jachowski, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenberg, F. v.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jachowski, L. A., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenberg, F. v.

Filarial Etiology of Tropical Hydroceles in Puerto Rico*

L. A. Jachowski, Jr.{dagger}, B. Gonzalez-Flores{ddagger} AND F. v. Lichtenberg§

It was the consensus of the authors that, despite the limitations inherent in the clinical, pathological and serological methods in this study, the systematic application of these methods had been of value in establishing that (1) filariasis plays an important role in the development of tropical hydrocele in Puerto Rico; (2) of 42 hydrocele patients, 24 had positive or suggestive evidence of filarial disease (59%), when all criteria were combined; (3) filarial etiology could be eliminated in 10 patients (23%) of which two had a history of trauma and the remaining eight appeared to be of the idiopathic variety; and (4) agreement between pathological and serological data was obtained in 81% of the cases, and in no case was there disagreement with the clinical data.

However, after correlating all findings there remained, besides a filarial, a traumatic, and an idiopathic group of hydroceles, 8 cases (18% of the series) in which no conclusions could be reached and in which pathological and serological data conflicted. For this reason, the incidence of filarial hydrocele in Puerto Rico has not been definitely determined in this series.

There is an evident need for further studies on the immunology and pathogenesis of filariasis, and for the development of accurate diagnostic methods for filarial disease.


* The Pathological portion of the study was supported in part by Research Contract DA-49-007-MD-926 with the Office of the Surgeon General, U. S. Army. The serological portion of the study was sponsored by the Naval Medical Research Institute under BuMed Project MR 005.09-1033.01 with the cooperation and at the facilities of the Army Tropical Research Medical Laboratory.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Navy Department or the naval service at large.


{dagger} Naval unit attached to the Army Tropical Research Medical Laboratory, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Present address: Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda 14, Maryland.


{ddagger} Urology Clinic, Municipal Hospital, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Present address: Brumbaugh 1104, Esq. Arzuaga, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico.


§ Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Present address: Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.