AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 10(1), 1961, pp. 112-113
Copyright © 1961 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, H. S.

Aedes Aegypti: The Yellow Fever Mosquito

by SIR S. RICKARD CHRISTOPHERS, C.I.E., O.B.E., F.R.S., I.M.S. (Ret'd.). 1st edition, 739 pages, illustrated. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1960. $14.50

Henry S. Fuller
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Washington, D. C.

By reason of their autecology and synecology, Homo sapiens and Aëdes aegypti developed close interspecies associations which served to the detriment of man and the benefit of the mosquito. During the current century the tables were reversed and the underdog became the mosquito. When its role as a vector of yellow fever had been demonstrated by the scientific method, technology—the handmaiden of science—was applied with ever increasing effectiveness to the destruction of this insect species. The control of A. aegypti is an outstanding early example of "species sanitation" and "species eradication," both practiced at the turn of the century. Entomologists, who previously had concentrated their efforts on other groups of insects, were now motivated by practical considerations to include mosquitoes in their objects of study, for the occasion was instant. During the period from 1762, when A. aegypti acquired a species name, to 1900, when its importance in mass human disease was clearly proved, this insect was regarded as nothing more than a pest by the laity and as an object of curiosity by those interested in natural history.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.